![]() |
Archive pick November 12, 2001 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Nationwide bestseller! Number two with
a bullet! Box-office smash! Popularity and the economics of profit
go hand-in-hand. Bestseller lists in the world of books, top 40 charts
for music, weekly ratings of television shows, and Hollywood reports
on movie box-office receipts not only provide us with a barometer
on our popular culture, but also serve an important marketing purpose.
Take book bestseller lists as an example. A book that makes it to the top of the New York Times bestseller list can proudly display "#1 New York Times Bestseller" on its book jacket. The publishers hope that you will be in a bookstore, see the book, and think, "If everyone else is reading it and buying it, then why aren't I?" There are many book bestseller lists, but the most widely discussed and quoted lists appear in the weekly New York Times Book Review. When those lists change, it's news. In late July of 2000, the New York Times restructured its bestseller lists for the first time in 16 years. Among the changes was the addition of children's book lists. And the reason for the changes was... Harry Potter. Up until the change in the New York Times bestseller lists, its main bestseller list for fiction had been dominated by the books in the Harry Potter series by J. K. Rowling. Not coincidentally, the New York Times made the change just as the fourth book in the series was being released. Creating the children's bestseller lists meant that the New York Times could move the Harry Potter books off the "main" hardcover fiction list and onto the new children's list. In an interview with the Boston Globe, New York Times Book Review editor Charles McGrath gave this reason for the changes, "The sales and popularity of children's books can rival and, in the case of the Harry Potter books, even exceed those of adult books. With a separate children's list, we can more fully represent what people are reading, and we can clear more room on the adult list for adult books." Supporters of the move particularly publishers other than Harry Potter publisher, Scholastic Press were happy to see the hardcover fiction list opened up for different books (i.e. their books). Not everyone was convinced. Critics claimed that the New York Times was out of touch with the public, that a large percentage of the series' readers were adults, and that any books that sold as well as the Harry Potter books deserved to be on the main bestseller list. But the list changes remained and, rather than Harry Potter appearing in four of the top ten spots in the main hardcover fiction list, Harry Potter "disappeared" onto the children's lists.
Some book bestseller lists, such as the one published in USA Today, represent the raw data of actual book sales. But raw numerical data isn't the only way to represent something's popularity. The New York Times "weights" its list, so that the numbers are an interpretation of the raw data. The Nielsen ratings tell how many people viewed a particular television show as a percentage of all possible viewers watching television at that hour and on that day. And we hear about how successful or popular movies are when the movie industry tells us how much money the movie "raked in" at the box office. In non-Hollywood terms, the "gross" represents how many people bought tickets to see that movie, expressed as the total amount of money those people spent for those tickets. Students can learn about collecting and representing data in the following Destination Math activities from the MSC V module, Fundamental Statistics:
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||